I need help writing 6-8 page exam question. I need help from someone who is VERY GOOD at understating political philosophy
THERE MUST BE NO PLAGIARISM AT ALL. I WILL KNOW IF YOU PLAGIARIZED!!. There must be NO GRAMMATICAL ERRORS
READING ALL OF THE DIRECTIONS CAREFULLY!!!
YOU MUST READ ALL OF READINGS I have assigned. You MUST INCLUDE THE READINGS IN YOUR PAPER.
Introduction: Please state your thesis here. Please be should one sentence only. Straight to the point of what you will be arguing about
FOLLOW THIS FORMAT FOR EACH QUESTION!!
Body Paragraphs: arguments and analysis
Conclusion: Going summarize what you said in your body paragraphs and refer back to your thesis argument!
Below are two questions for this exam. Please answer each question as thoroughly as possible while remaining within the page limits. You should use assigned readings and lectures as well as your own work to answer these questions, ALL QUOTED AND PARAPHRASED MATERIAL MUST BE CITED ACCURATELY CITED DO NOT USE OUTSIDE RESEARCH IN THIS EXAM. I WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH THE MATERIALS YOU WILL NEED AND MUST USE,
In order to keep your answers within guidelines you will have to be EXTREMELY concise and focus quickly on your key arguments and discussions. YOU MUST HAVE THESIS YOUR EACH QUESTION. YOU MUST ANALYSIS YOUR THESIS AND YOUR THESIS AND ARGUMENTS MUST FLOW ACCORDINGLY. There is no room for unnecessary asides or inclusion of long quoted pages. Keep the page limit in mind as you conduct your answers.
Each answer should be NO MORE THAN 3-4 PAGES IN LENGTH (APPROX. 1.100-1500 WORDS) for total exam length of between 6-8 pages, double-spaced,with 1″ margins all around). Please use a standard 12-point font( Time New Roman)
CLEARLY IDENTITY WHICH QUESTION YOUR ANSWERS. For example, if your answer question one, let it known,
All pages MUST BE NUMBERED. Please include a cover sheet. Cover page DOESN’T count toward your total page count.
Grading Criteria: Things to keep in mind while you are completing the exam.
Quality of analysis:50% of grade
Does your argument flow from logical premises? Have your carefully and creditably defined your terms ? Have you considered the implication of your argument?
Quality of argumentation: 25% of grade
Have your supported your position with evidence from the readings ? Have you taken into consideration alternative positions and responded to them? In other words, have would you answers if someone challenges your arguments and how will you convince them?
Quality of Presentation” 25%of grade
Have you followed the technical requirements listed above ?
Did you carefully edit your answers?( Please read your paper at least 4 times before submitting it to me). Use Grammarly to help you out with any grammar corrections.
Are your arguments presented clearly and concisely ? Is all quoted and paraphrased material accurately cited?
In Summa Theolguie, St Thomas Aquinas argues that man governed by two kinds of law, the eternal and unchanging divine law(or its reasonable approximation in natural law) and the impermanent and temporal law of man or positive law. With regard to man’s law, Auniqas puts forth the proposition:
It would seem there is not a human law. For the natural law is participation of the eternal laws, as stated above. Now, through the eternal law, “all things are most orderly”, as Augustine states. Therefore, the natural law suffices for the ordering of all human affairs. Consequently, there is no need for human law. ( Cahn, 2012,306)
Using the text for support, please describe Aqunias’s justification of human law and its limits. Pay particular attention to the structure of the political community. In what ways does this community comport with that described by Aristotle in Politic? Please say ATTENTION to the PART of the question!!!
Article 3. Whether there is a human law?
Merriam- Webster’s Online Dictionary defines Machiavellian: …suggesting the principles of conduct laid down by Machiavelli, specially marked by cunning, duplicity, or bad faith.
In Machiavelli Machiavellian? Please use specific references to BOTH the Prince and Discourse, to support your conclusion but remember that the conclusion is to be YOURS , NOT MACHIAVELLI’S
https://archive.org/details/princediscourses00mach_0/page/10/mode/2up Zoom in if you cannot see the text well